Friday, 29 August 2008

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


I didn't think that "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" could be as entertaining, engrossing or satisfying. Not the best of the bunch but deserving of its place amongst the other films.

Indiana Jones, now over sixty and still up to his old tricks, goes after the Soviets during the ‘50s (McCarthyism and Soviet hate was running pretty high then!), with both parties searching for the Crystal Skull, an enigmatic idol that could hold the key to mysteries and treasures beyond anything Jones has found before. Tagging along is Mutt Willaims (LaBoeuf), who may have a connection to the old professor that neither of them know about...

The acting here is pretty brilliant, especially considering the talent on display. The co-stars are many in number however, and this does detract from their performances, with such actors as John Hurt and Jim Broadbent given small roles, hardly befitting of their acting prowess. Harrison Ford resurrects (no old age pun intended) the character of Indiana Jones here as if he had never been gone, and is a large part of why the film was so surprisingly good. He seems to just fall back into the role, albeit as an older, wiser, creakier Dr. Jones, which is totally befitting of the character's portrayal. Cate Blanchett plays the weirdest villain yet, an icy Russian agent who seeks the eponymous Crystal Skull. Having such a famous actress as such a bizarre villain was off-putting at times, but she hams it up and makes the performance sinister enough to register as evil here. The only other female character, Marion (from the first film) pops up with almost a cameo performance, and is used to push forward the plot with some revealing truths. However, some of the spark between her and Jones can be seen, evoking "Raiders" and reminding the viewer of what came before.

Shia LaBoeuf, John Hurt and Ray Winstone are the supporting male actors in this film - that's how good it is. LaBouef's character Mutt Williams completely apes Marlon Brando's character from "On The Waterfront", right down to the swagger and self-assurance, and the rumours about his character...well, I'll let you see for yourself! He manages to contend with Ford very well here, showing that he is becoming a very good young actor. John Hurt plays an insane professor with knowledge of the skulls, and so has very little to do but appear mad. Winstone is Mac, Jones' war buddy, and his motivations and actions do create a little intrigue, but in all honesty he is wasted a bit here too.

The film looks good and sounds amazing, which was to be expected from Steven Spielberg. At too many points however the CGI does distract, and in a series which always relied on the practical, it's a shame to be able to spot so many computer effects. The visuals, quite honestly, were my main problem with the film. The over-reliance on CGI really took away from a lot of the action, and the insistence that a lot of it was still physical and real is a lie, really. The conclusion to the film is the only part when CGI is not only totally necessary (when you watch it, you WILL understand) but appears better than at any other point. And what is wrong with getting real prairie dogs, scorpions, monkeys and ants?! CGI animals used when the real alternative created much of the tension in the past films makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, and again I sense Luca's digital obsession seeping through.

This strangely didn't feel like a Spielberg film to me, but then I guess that he's changed in his approach to filmmaking over time. The quips, crazy action and parental complexes still remain though, so you can see glimpses of him in there. What worries me is that the dirty fingerprints of George Lucas can be seen throughout this film; Spielberg doesn't have as much power as he used to. The dialogue is almost as good as before, particularly when concerned with the professor's age, his "allegiance" to America and his profession itself. What it really does however is remind you of the other films, which whilst being a good thing is detrimental to this new film, which suffers from too much exposition and too little humour.

What can I say but "Raiders March"? You know from the off that the music will be awesome, and it doesn't disappoint. Whenever that particular motif began, you could feel the audience in the cinema smiling and the anticipation increasing. John Williams seems to have that power through his fantastic compositions, and the "Ark Theme" pops up, again maintaining that link between the films.

I wish “Crystal Skull” had been more like the old Indy films, because in thinking again about it, I do feel that the previous three are so, so much better. This isn’t a complete disaster by any means; it’s still a great movie. I just wish that the promises of more real stunts, less CGI and a good story had been more strictly adhered to, but I guess you can’t get everything you want. As Indy says, he works only “part-time”, and in that sense, you can project that particular comment onto the filmmakers themselves and their efforts here.

7/10

No comments:

Post a Comment